Comments on: Midweek Cuckoo: George Hammond

By: Derek

Derek — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:23:47 +0000

I disagree
Can you give more info?

By: Bonzo The Tap Dancing Chimp

Bonzo The Tap Dancing Chimp — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:48:29 +0000

Hammond’s work may indeed be of interest to the scientific community, especially those in the community seeking to understand mental disorders.

By: Mr Angry

Mr Angry — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 03:28:39 +0000

I would pay more attention to science if actual scientists conducted discourse like that. Mind you, I would pay a lot less attention to science if more scientists were spouting drivel like his “proof” of god – so i suppose it evens out.

By: Cuzco

Cuzco — Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:49:50 +0000

Shorter George Hammond
XYZt = ENPg
4 = 4
QED

Seriously though one has to marvel at a “mind” that actually believes that epectorated blob of blendered jargon contains even one quanta of useful information. His whole life must be like one big acid trip.

By: totalwaste

totalwaste — Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:40:07 +0000

well, seeing as god is in the details, i suppose now would be a good time to investigate calabi-yau spaces to see if we can find him. when your curvature contains a good deal of aged beard-hair (reminiscent of mouldy rice), you might want to show a little respect.

By: Salman

Salman — Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:55:51 +0000

This reminds me of what happens when you read The Onion and CNN.com at the same time, and get confused about which story is on which site. Con_Tester, you are the master of satire, or so I hope.

By: Con-Tester

Con-Tester — Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:59:29 +0000

Reality – the undoing of many a humble genius.

There’s some truth to god being GR’s curvature tensor, though much more in an allegorical rather than Hammond’s literal sense, I think. The question of who or what doubles as the metric tensor arises naturally in this scheme, as does that of the meaning of a g(e)odesic.